ACCA P5 Advance Performance Management
CIMA Official
definition 2006
Benchmarking is
defined as:
'Establishment,
through data gathering, of target and comparators, that permits relative levels
of performance (and particularly areas of underperformance) to be identified.
Adoption of identified best practices should improve performance.’
Types of benchmarking
'Internal
benchmarking: comparing one operating unit or function with another within the
same industry.’
'Functional
benchmarking: comparing internal functions with those of the best external practitioners,
regardless of their industry.’ (Also known as operational benchmarking or
generic benchmarking).
'Competitive
benchmarking: in which information is gathered about direct competitors through
techniques such as reverse engineering.’
'Strategic
benchmarking: type of competitive benchmarking aimed at strategic action and
organisational change.
( Operational
benchmark, Competitor benchmark, process benchmark, Historical benchmark,
Industry benchmark, Best in class benchmark, International benchmark)
Benchmarking process
Ø
Select processes/ activities to be benchmark
Ø
Assign responsibility to benchmarking team (Identify KPIs)
Ø
Identify suitable benchmarking partners –
industry leader/club
Ø
Assign activities to partners – debrief and
documentation
Ø
Analysis the gap
Ø
Implementation of agreed changes in processes/activities
Ø
Review the performance and benchmarking process
Benchmarking is a continuous program not a one off project.
Benefits of benchmarking:
Ø
Encourage learning and adopting changes
Ø
Helps identify performance gap
Ø
Show that performance targets can be achieved
Ø
Increases management capabilities
Ø
Enables process/activity improvement
Ø
Focuses on changes in external environment
Ø
Generates an understanding of world class performance
Ø
Minimize self-satisfaction with own performance
Problems of benchmarking (Form CIMA Article)
Problems of implementing benchmarking programs and
obstacles to deriving maximum benefit include:
Ø
deciding which activities/processes to benchmark
Ø
identifying ‘best in class’ or other suitable
benchmarking partners
Ø
overcoming internal staff resistance
Ø
resource constraints
Ø
overcoming confidentiality issues from either
benchmarking partner
Ø
recognizing and allowing for performance
differences arising from non-transferable process input elements (for example,
employees’ skills/knowledge, organisational structure/culture)
Ø
a tendency to focus on what is currently being
done, rather than considering potential future practices/innovative
breakthroughs.
ACCA Article: Benchmarking
CIMA Article: Benchmarking
No comments:
Post a Comment